In 2011, the Congress has already passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act to restrict the notoriously broad and vague scope of defining patents. This bill defined certain rules in issuing patents through changing from the "first-to-invent" system to "first inventor-to-file" system as well as a grace period. With this act still settling into the U.S. IP law system, some people are questioning if further enforcement like the proposed Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes (SHIELD) Act is really necessary. One major concern would be defining a patent troll and determine whether the buyer/company helps or hurts other businesses.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2030875/tech-companies-tell-congress-to-target-patent-trolls.html
I think this definitely a step towards the right direction in eliminating patent trolls. You bring a good point about the discrepancy in defining patent trolls has been a core part of the issue. Many companies put up such a good disguise but at the heart of it are basic patent trolls. We need to come up with a strict standard to define and eradicate patent trolls.
ReplyDelete